Letsroll911.org

After studding the two videos shown at the top of this page, which are described as showing a flash from a "pod" at the bottom of the plane that hit the second tower, I noticed something kind of interesting...

The page that linked it described the flash as having occurred "at least 500 feet from the tower, and continued until the plane hit"...

The problem is, if you study the two videos closely, you might just notice that in the second video you can't see the flash until the plane is around a single plane length (less than 200 feet) from the tower... The two videos go at different speeds, and the only thing I can assume is that because if they were shown at the EXACT same frame rate, it would be much more noticeable that the flash in the second video happens much later than in the first...

This must only mean one of two things:
1) These are videos of two different planes shooting a missile from different distances. Somehow the government managed to crash two planes at the same time into the same building at the same place but somehow made it look like one plane from all the camera angles.

Or...
2) The flash has everything to do with the angle of the sun and the perspective angle from the camera. The same way two people from two locations won't get the sun reflected into their eyes by a single mirror in a single location at the same time... Kind of like when the car's window in front of you is reflecting the sun directly into your eyes, while the car next to you does NOT have the same problem... The sun isn't in the right angle on the plane in the second video until it's around one plane length from the building... The fact that the plane is curved can increase or decrease the likelihood of this occurring. However there isn't any other logical explanation as to why a missile being fired from a single object would appear to happen at two completely different distances based on angle.
That would be unless the shape of the plane blocked the perspective... However if you look at the so called flash in the first video, when it occurs it illuminates the entire length of the side of the plane (except for the area blocked by the wing, which since it's tilted up, should in fact show at least SOME* of the flash in that area - unless it's caused by the sun which is above the wing)... At no point does it appear to move any further back than it does in the very beginning.

Basically, what it boils down to, is the fact that the only way this is physically possible is that the flash has to be physically ON the plane, not just outside of it the way a missile or some other object attached under the wing would be. And whatever caused it would have to be direction dependent. Because if you physically attached a light on that area and switched it on, that too should be visible from both angles at the same time. The only real explanation for these two videos showing what they do IS A DIRECTIONAL REFLECTION! So C'mon... Gimme a break...

Oh, and before someone accuses me of working for the government or something -- read my page. I've had this domain since... er ummm, at least 6 or 7 years... I forgot when I registered the domain... But I have had a page actively up on the internet since I was in 8th grade (10 years-ish)... I am a republican, and I did vote for Bush... I'm not an expert on any of this, I simply think this info is obvious...

* - I say SOME here because I know someone will try to argue that the little part of the pod sticking down is where the flash comes from, therefore there can't be any light there. However the pod isn't very long, so the area that would be darker should be shorter than that ENTIRE distance that is dark...

** - I use missle here, but the arguement applies the same for a descriptor of any object that caused some sort of explosive release underneath the plane...