It never ceases to amaze me exactly how much of the global warming support focuses on attacking those who disagree with the theory as apposed to addressing the science. Those putting the argument forward spend 90% of their argument trying to attack the detractor, and the other 10% is spent selectively focusing on specific environmental events, as if somehow those specific events are proof positive...

If the proof is there, the 90% of the argument spent on detractors is 100% unnecessary. However, yet another article writer is doing this, now stating that:

Let's just say that global warming deniers are now on a par with Holocaust deniers

For starters, this is a wholly unscientific statement. Nothing today comes close to proving the future by any means, so to say this as fact is disingenuous. 30 years ago the big end of the world story was global cooling, yet the global warming side is trying very hard to ignore this historical fact (much like Holocaust deniers)...

But I do have a statement which I believe is much more accurate in response:

Global Warming supporters are on par with those who used to state as absolute fact that Earth was the center of the universe

My statement is 100 times more accurate than hers...

Oh, and for the record, I drive a hybrid insight & have replaced all but 4 light bulbs in my house with Neon bulbs. So the holier than though argument (even taking into account the manner that they try to use to slip it in) is fully moot as well...

Nice try Ellen Goodman...