If you were to ask NASA 2 months ago what the warmest year on record is to date, they would have stated 1998, seeming to show Global Warming as a modern and real issue.

Someone wondering why some ominous data was apparent in the graph released by NASA reverse engineered their algorithm, and it interestingly turns out that NASA's software was suffering from a Y2K type bug.

NASA was contacted and they proceeded to quietly fix the error, and released new data. That data shows the warmest year on record did not occur in 1998... It occurred in 1934.

Its interesting to note that many Global Warming theory advocates were spewing this data right and left before (and the originator of the flawed data became visible due to his accusation that the Bush administration was trying to silence his data), however upon release of the correction both NASA and the same advocates have been inexplicably silent... If it weren't for the fact that an outsider discovered the bug in the first place, it would have most likely have never even been detected...

If Global Warming theory advocates are truly unbiased and only site facts, as all of them claim to be doing, then why be so silent about anything that might call in to question many of the arguments? The only logical reason is the pure and simple fact that those professing Global Warming theory are at the very least just as biased as they try to claim those who discount the theory are.