Remember 9/11 Torgo Count
1102503
Torgo
468x60ani_smallani
Learn About Torgo.org Affiliates


About The Author The Torgo Blog
The Torgo Blog


    UTC - Kerry - He's Not Bush   
      I was listening to Rush Limbaugh while driving to lunch today, as I often do, and there was an interesting caller.

      Apparently Rush was asking for someone supporting Kerry to give good, strong reasons they support him. He managed to get a caller, who had given a couple reasons by the time I started my car. I was able to get the gist of reasons. The ones I heard were:


      • Wanted Condy Rice out
      • Wanted John Ashcroft out
      • Wanted Donald Rumsfield out
      • Didn't want Lynne Cheney to be his first lady [if something happened to Bush]


      So, basically he gave what he felt was solid reasoning not to support Bush, but quite literally didn't give a single reason as to why Kerry was the one he supported. I think there is a vast majority of people out there who support Kerry under the same pretense...

      To boil it down, if Charlie Manson was the only person running against Bush, the liberals would support him... To put it another way, the main reason Kerry got the nomination instead of Howard Dean was because Kerry didn't yelp.

      Now I'm wondering how many people will vote for Kerry without knowing anything he plans on doing if he's elected...

      [EDIT]

      I'm adding this because I found confirmation in the public media that in fact indicates the backing behind Kerry is solely due to the fact that:
      ...at least he's not George W. Bush.

      So if you thought everything I said above the [EDIT] was wrong, here is direct evedence from the media... People support Kerry solely because he's not Bush... So the issue of who Kerry is or what he stands for, and what he'll do takes a back seat to this one point...


    UTC - iPod Xskn vs iSkin   
      Tempest in a Specialty IPod Case

      This is something I've been familiar with for some time, and wanted to give a little input. The first case I got for my origional iPod was an iSkin. I mainly liked the plastic cover with the loop for a wrist strap. Later on, however, iSkin released it's cases without a wrist strap loop. Instead, they expected users to put a metal belt clip on the back of the case to attach a strap. My problem with this is that I had no intetion of adding a big hunking metal strip just to add a strap.

      I emailed iSkin commenting about this, and they NEVER responded (this was a couple years ago at this point). I then found Xskn. In the beginning I did get confused due to the 2 companies using the same names for their cases. After some time reading about them, I now understand what's going on.

      I did buy an Xskn, since it had everything I was looking for (everything = wrist strap loop on side of case). Also there was one other neat feature: Since the 3G (Third Generation) iPod has all touch sensitive surfaces, the Xskn case has a covering completely over all the buttons & scroll wheel. This is kind of neat, because the buttons are fully protected, yet they still are touch sensitive...

      iSkin recently released a new line of iSkins called Evo. And while the material used to make them is nice, they still expect you to use the big metal clip to use a wrist strap. I still don't understand the theory behind this. If I use a wrist strap, why would I need a belt clip? If I use a belt clip, why would I need a strap??? That would be like someone writing the combination to a pad lock on the pad lock so they can be sure they don't forget it... They also don't protect the touch responsive surfaces like the Xskn does...

      The case I got is the Xskn 3. It's made of a very thin plastic material. I want to order an Xskn 2 to replace it, however, because they are much thicker. It will protect the iPod better than the Xskn 3. The Xskn 3 retails at around $10, which is less than half the price of the Xskn 2's, and the iSkins... However, for now I think I'll just stick with my Xskn 3... It does it's job very well...


    UTC - Idiots Not/In Line   
      I went to get lunch today at the Panda Express near my work. There were 3 guys in front of me ordering food "to go"... As I was waiting in line, the line was growing fairly rapidly...

      I asked for the items & got my plate, I then stood looking at the 3 guys in front of me floating all over the place, standing in nothing resembling a line, looking like they were waiting for an item to be finished (like they ordered egg rolls, but there were none left so they had to wait for them to finish making them). There was one person at the register, and they were being handed their change at the time I looked over...

      I made the assumption that these 3 were obviously not waiting to pay, because of the meandering formation they were standing in. So I then traversed the 3 person obstacle coarse, and proceeded to move behind the person who was paying. The guy standing back against the wall then walked up, and said "we're in line"...

      The only problem is that the one thing each of these guys was not, was in a line... There is a reason it's called a "line". This guy talked to me like I was rude to "walk in front of him" (which I shouldn't have been able to do if he was in fact standing in the line). I don't even think these guys realized that they were the rude ones, there were at least 10 people behind me by the time I got to the register, and half of those people would have been given their food and would have been ready to pay if these 3 guys weren't taking up so much room standing in their idea of a "line"...

      Just a hint guys: If you're next in line, try standing in the line at that point to make it obvious. Being you weren't wearing name tags, or identifying T-Shirts, I didn't realize you were in fact the founding members of The "What Line?" Idiots...


    UTC - Spam Services   
      I just wanted to put a post about my trials of spam blocking.

      For the last several months I had used a service called MessageFire, which costs around $5 a month. This service adds a header tag to my email containing JUNK for spam, and MAIL for non-spam. The header tag is also followed by a link which will allow me to re-categorize the email if it was tagged incorrectly. For a very long time, the service worked relatively well, however over the past few months I've noticed a growing number of messages sneaking though... Interestingly enough, the service was taken over by a new company a couple months ago, called MessageGate. I *think* they dropped individual accounts when they did this, though they allowed those that do subscribe to continue their accounts.

      With the number of spam messages that sneak through getting larger, I decided it was time to find a new service. I ran across SpamCop, for around $20-$30ish a month. It uses 2 services, both SpamCop's black list of sending domains, and SpamAssassin, a highly praised baysen [sp?] filter.

      When I started using SpamCop, I set my MessageFire account to disabled. After a day, I was finding somewhere near 40-50 messages a day getting though!!! I couldn't believe it. My only option would have been to turn down the reliability of SpamAssassin. I did NOT want to do this, however, due to the fact that when I emailed myself, each email had a rating of 5, the minimum I had SpamAssassin set to...

      So I tried something drastic. I re-enabled MessageFire, and began using both MessageFire and SpamCop (with SpamAssassin) at the same time. Since, I've been quite amazed by the accuracy. I'm averaging 1-5 spam messages getting though, though my level of non-spam being marked has gone up from 0 to 0-1 a day... I really don't like using 2 services (of which I both have to pay for), however, as of now it's my most reliable option...

      If anybody out there has any suggestions outside of MessageFire, SpamCop, and SpamAssassin (without the use of an external program or plug in), PLEASE let me know about it!!!


    UTC - Kerry's Canadian Plan for Health Care - Look Somewhere Else   
      Canadian Health Care: Dear America...

      Last week John Kerry called for a national healthcare system in the U.S., like the one in Canada. If you Americans are planning to institute a national universal healthcare system similar to ours, you might want to look somewhere other than Canada for the ideal model...

      ...health care was to be provided by the government only and that any form of private care was illegal...

      ...many of our best doctors moved to the United States, where government was not going to limit the amount of money they could earn....

      ...many tests and procedures are beginning to be de-listed; meaning that the public healthcare system will no longer pay for them. Among these are items such as PSA examinations, which is used to screen for prostate cancer in men, physiotherapy or chiropractic treatments, certain dermatological procedures, such as the removal of skin growths and eye examinations...

      ...While on a recent visit to Toronto's Orthopedic and Arthritic Hospital, a facility specializing in the treatment of bone and joint problems, I overheard the harried receptionist at the clinic explaining why the patient would have to wait four to five months to receive surgical treatment...

      ...Getting an MRI in Canada can take up to six months, although many Canadians choose to cross the border into the U.S. where they can get it next day for about $450...
      [Remember the bold sentence above]

      ...Other procedures can take longer, as in the case of hip or knee replacements, which can take three to four years of waiting...
      [I've had 2 hip replacements personally, when you need them, you CANNOT wait 3 to 4 years!]

      ...Those Canadians who can afford it (including, by the way Paul Martin, our Prime Minister) will get their medical treatment at private clinics in the U.S. to avoid waiting...


      Having personally required much medical care, I can tell you many of these scenarios are terrifing... I had private insurnace to cover many of my procedures, but my most recent battle with a severe infection in the hospital (so severe in fact that my family was told I was going to die, and the doctors litarally did nothing the first several days I was there) occured under a different plan, where my coverage was no where near as good as before... I am currently working on paying off what wasn't covered by the insurance, and will probably continue for quite some time...

      Had the situation been such that nobody could attend to me, I very likely wouldn't be here today. While I'm struggling to pay off thoes medical procedures now, in the grand scheme it seems like a small price to pay...


    UTC - About My Blog: A Reply to a Comment   
      This is a reply to a comment to another post. It was posted anonymously, however based on the wording I do have a guess as to who posted it... It's either someone I know very well, or it's just some anonymous web surfer (who needs to work on their english)...


      HELLO....... JUST WONDERING AROUND YOUR WEBSITE.
      A LOT OF UPDATE AND IS GETTING BETTER AND BETTER AND PRO ;P
      GOOD JOB!


      I've had my website (torgo.org) for many years at this point (I think since 1998)... I've always seen web design as kind of a hobby (thought it's also now what I do for a living). My bigest problem on my site is my tendency to go so long without updating it...

      My blog was actually derived from my old "What's New?" page. You can see a REALLY old version of it on archive.org:
         http://www.torgo.org/new.html
      [I just read this and realize just *how* old this is. This is right after I started my new job. This is the company I'm still working for, only I'm doing intranet stuff now (so I am doing web development)...]

      Anyway, I used blogger a year or two ago & set it's layout to be identical to the one shown on the "What's New" page. Starting a couple months ago, I finally decided to make my page full fledged blog...

      I tried to look at common layouts for blogs and worked off of them. I acutally did not base my blog on any layout, and pretty much started hammering the code out myself...

      I've been fairly constantly looking for features & stuff I could add... I'm also trying not to add way too much at the same time... I have a couple features that I have added the Code/HTML for, but commented out (hid) them in the code. The only one I can think of right now is the code to translate the page into other languages using Babelfish...

      Eventually I should get bored with updating the layout, or simply run out of things to change, at which point the layout will pretty much become permanent...


    UTC - Sony's 'misleading' Walkman marketing   
      Yahoo! News - Apple hits back at Sony's 'misleading' Walkman marketing

      I thought this was rather interesting. I hadn't been paying any attention to Sony's player (after all, I am an iPod owner, and the one I have now is my second iPod). When I read the first few lines of this story, I was full of ridicule for Sony's tactic...

      To put it simply, Sony has stated their new 20 GB "MP3" Player (MP3 is in quotes, because this is not the format used on the player, but puts the concept into perspective) is capable of holding 13,000 songs. This, they say, beats the iPod, which currently advertisers holding up to 10,000 songs (on Apple's 40GB iPod). This would set their 20 GB player at holding 5,000 songs. So basically Sony is saying their 13,000 song player trumps Apple's 10,000 song iPod...

      To clarify how encoding works, I will use a reference many are familiar with. If you recall recording TV shows using a VCR, you probably remember that there are usually 3 settings of recording quality. The high quality gives better picture & sound, however it only allows a total of 2 hours per video tape. The low quality setting allows 6 hours to be recorded on the tape, however the picture is blurry and the sound is staticy. The same type of thing happens with MP3... At high quality the music is much clearer, but the file itself is much larger. At a lower setting the file is smaller, but the song sounds worse. So if you encode an MP3 at a high rate, say 340Kbps, the MP3 file's size would be at around 7MB. Take that same song and encode it at around 128Kbps, and the MP3 is now only 4MB in size, but the sound quality isn't as good. So basically there is a trade off between file size and sound quality...

      So, what's happening is this: Apple says their 40GB iPod will hold 10,000 songs. This is assuming all the songs are encoded with AAC (a format like MP3) at 128Kbps. This rate is a good trade off between size & quality. All my songs are encoded at this level, and they all sound fine to me. This is also the rate that all the songs on the iTunes Music Store are encoded at.

      Sony, on the other hand, is measuring the size of their player using their proprietary encodes of ATRAC3 (another format similar to MP3) of a rate of 48Kbps. In this manner the songs are much smaller, however, the sound quality is terrible!!! There is probably nobody who uses Sony's player and encodes at this level... This level is the lowest possible setting, and is around 1/3 the default setting Sony uses!!! Using the same tactic, you could argue the 40GB iPod holds around 80,000 songs!!! This would be done by setting iTunes to encode at Apple's lowest possible setting of 16Kbps. The end result, however, would sound worse than music on an AM radio!!!

      I can't believe Sony is doing this... Next they're going to say the player last 5 times longer than the iPod on a single battery charge, if you keep the volume completely off!!!


Learn About Torgo.org Affiliates
Apple Think Different Last updated:  Fri, Oct 31, 2008 - 9:47 PM UTC

Click here for your favorite eBay items