Remember 9/11 Torgo Count
 1102611
Torgo
   Home | The Torgo Store  | Bobby's Info | BP Subs | Mortal Kombat | BobbyWare | The Numskull Award | Guestbook   
   The Torgo Forum | The Torgo Blog | Arcade Blog   
$5 Off $50 Coupon! Click Here!
Learn About Torgo.org Affiliates


About The Author The Torgo Blog
The Torgo Blog

 The Torgo Homepage  >  The Torgo Blog  >  Archive

    UTC - Kerry Walks All Over More People   
      If this happened near my house, I would be extreamly angry! Kerry still thinks he's way more important than anybody else on the planet, and he's not affraid to shove that in peoples' faces!

      Kerry's visit to Canonsburg, PA
       
      Good Tuesday morning!  John Kerry brought his "front porch meeting" to our Canonsburg, PA neighborhood on Labor Day morning.  Since you will never hear the truth from the TV or print media I thought that you should know from someone who was almost' there.
       
      The residents who live on the street where the event took place were not allowed to attend.

      Kerry shipped in approximately 90 invitation only VIPs.  In addition, there was a hard luck case who was about to lose her job at USAIR and another was an elderly woman who was having health care problems.
      Neither one was from this neighborhood. The street was closed to all traffic the night before and all residents on the street were REQUIRED to remove their Bush/Cheney signs.

      The sympathetic police officers on duty told us that Kerry used imminent domain to claim the street for his purposes.  Residents who have homes within the perimeter (approximately 1 full block) were kept behind a line away from the partisan crowd.  The rest of us were not allowed within the 1 block cordon.  A neighbor from across the street came to the line where we were being kept and asked us to come onto his property.  The police
      told us that we could not stand on this mans FORMERLY private property!  This was set up so that Kerry's views could be heard - but not the neighbors.  About 30 peoples (mostly neighbors) shouts echoed down the street "Let the neighbors in".

      We could barely hear Kerry speaking with his microphone because press buses were used to block us off  from view!  This mornings papers are reporting  hecklers tried to interrupt Kerry as he spoke to the neighborhood gathering, but he turned our chants to his favor by calling us rude.  Even though most of the media was there to record our stories of not being included in the neighborhood forum,  not one of them printed or aired the truth.
      This is what America will look like if Kerry becomes president.

      Get registered and get all of your friends registered to vote if they have not already.  Kerry thinks that he is better than the rest of us and he has the media on his side to make him out to be what he is not!

      Finally, last night as I drove down the street where the rally was,  I was shocked to see Bush/Cheney signs in almost every yard on the street!


    UTC - MSNBC IS Rewriting History   
      MSNBC - Rewriting History

      I actually found this lie, on behalf of MSNBC, kind of amuzing...
      ...Saddam's regime had been listed for years by the U.S. government as a 'state sponsor of terror,'...

      But except for the allegation about Iraqi ties to Al Qaeda'a claim that is now more in question than ever the other examples cited by Cheney in Tuesday night's debate never have been previously emphasized by Bush administration officials, and for good reasons...

      The reason I can state this as a lie was due to me, the other night, flipping though channels and stoping on our local cable channel (which I documented in a prevous post). It had a liberally biased show on where they were playing clips of republicans before the war talking about the dangers of Saddam.

      What is interesting here is a speach given by presedent Bush, which directly stated that one of the reasons to oust Saddam was due to his vast ties with terrorist networks... What makes this more interesting is the fact that my source for this information did, as I said, come from a liberally biased show!!! Always amuzing when you can break apart some liberals supposed facts with other liberals attempts to incriminate the right...

      I still found it amuzing that in that show, there was not one single clip of a Democrat saying these same things, even though there were just as many solid quotes from the left (including people like Ted Kennedy, Hillary Clinton, and John Kerry) as there were from the right...

      And just as soon as a conservative documented these, with links, thoes links all of a sudden mysterously started dieing, almost as if all these liberals were trying to hide from their own words...


    UTC - Reason For Being In Iraq   
      I received what basically constitutes a spam message this morning. It's from a site called renoion.com. It contains a letter from a member who is currently in Iraq, SPC Harry Miller. Contained in that statement was the following paragraph:
      Many people disagree as to whether or not we should be in Iraq. MY reason for being there became clear the first time I met a little girl named Julie, and looked into her eyes. She looked as if she hadn't eaten in days, and if she had, it couldn't have been much. I shared some of my MRE (food ration) with her. She said "thank you" to me in the best English she could. She warmed my heart and broke it at the same time. See, there are thousands of kids just like her in Iraq. There are now more programs in Iraq bringing food, medicine and materials for schools and education. My reason for being there was for the people.
        SPC Harry Miller


      For those of you who think we should get out of Iraq right now, tell me what you would say to this girl. Regardless of why, being in Iraq is essential. I'm rather certain for this girl, it currently is. WMDs may have been the key reason in the first place, but there were countless other reasons which may seem insignificant in the grand scale, but together constitute many reasons for going in...

      The other day I was flipping though channels on the TV, and came across a blatantly liberal biased show on our local cable channel 6. They proceeded to play countless clips of the Bush administration talking about WMDs. I found 2 key things interesting about this little piece.

      1) At NO point in time did they play a single clip of any Democrats words saying the exact same thing. For those of you in denial, my last post links to a page which fully documents countless liberals words talking about Iraq's WMDs, some long before Bush even took office. I think the entire Democrat party still believes none of them ever said Iraq had them, even though most of those with the loudest liberal voices today all in fact said Iraq did...

      2) Bush's given reasons in these clips included things other than WMDs, including the fact that Saddam has given safe haven to many terrorists, including high ranking members of Al Queda. So for those of you who believe the only reason Bush ever gave was WMDs, you are again incorrect...


      I truly thought I would never say this, but I in fact agree with things many liberals once said. The this includes the following people:

      President Clinton, Madeline Albright, Sandy Berger, Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, Nancy Pelosi, Joe Lieberman, Al Gore, Ted Kennedy, Robert Byrd, Hillary Clinton, Jay Rockerfeller, Bob Graham

      Boy, if anybody were to tell me the phrase "I agree with Ted Kennedy" would come out of my mouth I would have told them they were insane...
      We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.
        Sen. Ted Kennedy, Sept. 27, 2002


    UTC - Democrats Lying About WMDs?   
      Weapons of Mass Destruction

      If you think Bush has been lying about WMDs, then I have to tell you there were a ton of Democrats lying about them long before Bush took office...

      With all these, you'd think the only thing Bush did wrong was to trust what these liberals were saying...

      [UPDATE]
      I decided to add the quotes direclty, mainly so I can be certain they aren't lost forever...


      "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
      develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That
      is our bottom line."

          President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

      "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We
      want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass
      destruction program."

          President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

      "Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal
      here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear,
      chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest
      security threat we face."

          Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.

      "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times
      since 1983."

          Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18,1998.

      "[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S.
      Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate,
      air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to
      the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction
      programs."

          Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998

      "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass
      destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he
      has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."

          Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

      "Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass
      destruction and palaces for his cronies."

          Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.

      "There is no doubt that ... Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons
      programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs
      continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam
      continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a
      licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten
      the United States and our allies."

          Letter to President Bush, Signed by Joe Lieberman (D-CT), John McCain (Rino-AZ) and others, Dec. 5, 2001

      "We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a
      threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
      mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction
      and the means of delivering them."

          (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.

      "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical
      weapons throughout his country."

          Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

      "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to
      deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in
      power."

          Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

      "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing
      weapons of mass destruction."

          Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.

      "The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
      confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
      biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to
      build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence
      reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."

          Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

      "I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority
      to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I b elieve
      that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real
      and grave threat to our security."

          Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.

      "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively
      to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the
      next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated
      the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."

          Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002.

      "He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every
      significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his
      chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has
      refused to do"

          Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.

      "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that
      Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weap ons
      stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has
      also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda
      members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein
      will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical
      warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."

          Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002.

      "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam
      Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for
      the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction."

          Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002.

      "[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
      murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
      particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
      miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his contin ued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ..."
          Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003.


      I didn't include links to the documentation of these quotes. As it stands, much of the linked material is mysterously disappearing. The news sources & other lib sites are trying to cover up the things being said before... Rather dishonest if you ask me, but once again this liberal tactic doesn't supprise me...
Date/Time
September 03, 2010
Friday - 09/03/10
04:13 AM UTC
Author
Bobby Thompson
Camarillo, CA
 B9 d+ t k- s u-- f-
i+ o x-- e l+ c-
Translate
Blogroll
    Prevous Posts
    Archives
    • Main Page

    Powered by Blogger
    Transmitted To Space by BlogInSpace
    Listed on BlogShares

    Learn About Torgo.org Affiliates
    Apple Think Different Copyright© 1998-2007 Last updated:  Wed, Feb 27, 2008 - 11:01 PM UTC

    Click here for your favorite eBay items